How To Become A Centaur

Essay Competition Winner | The old story of AI is about human brains working against silicon brains. The new story of IA will be about human brains working with silicon brains. As it turns out most of the world is the opposite of a chess game: Non-zero-sum—both players can win.
BEING AWARE OF THE JEOPARDIZES AND HAVING FULL ENJOYMENT OF THE SECOND MACHINE AGE
re
(edited)

Since Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelley, the fear of artificial intelligence (AI) is told on various platforms. For the people who don’t have any contribution of AI it is needless to be afraid of AI. Because keeping the pace of anxiety could only give harm but nothing more. Otherwise they will suffer twice if bad things that they had expected happen. Here some are mostly mentioned anxieties related with the economic effects of including of robots to business life.

 

Since Industrialisation Had Started The Same Anxiety

Karl Marx, writing during the age of steam, described the automation of the proletariat as a necessary feature of capitalism.[1] Yet it doesn’t have to be just for the sake of capitalism. If we look at health sector, we can understand how urgent those improvements must be made. Humans can choose to redistribute that capital in order to replace income lost to robots.[2] Today, researchers are primarily interested in designing one-way systems, which can read brain signals and then send them to devices such as prosthetic limbs and cars.[3] Robotic technologies that collect and interpret unprecedented amounts of data about human behaviour actually threaten both access to information and freedom of choice.[4]

 

Implementations In the sectors

And current discussions of economic policy focus on how to improve workers’ job and wage prospects. That makes sense, since robots and artificial intelligence are not on the brink of learning how to do every job.[5]

MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory recently developed system that allowed groups of robots to assemble IKEA Furniture.[6] The economist Carl Benedikt Frey and the machine learning expert Michael Osborne, both of Oxford University, have concluded that 47 percent of U.S. jobs are at high risk from automation. In the nineteenth century, they argue, machines replaced artisans and benefited unskilled labor.

In the twentieth century, computers replaced middle-income jobs, creating a polarized labor market. Over the next decades, they write, “most workers in transportation and logistics occupations, together with the bulk of office and administrative support workers, and labour in production occupations, are likely to be substituted by computer capital.”[7] And also in agriculture, which was the dominant employer of humanity between the dawn of the agricultural revolution and the nineteenth century.[8]

Besides robots could have not only negative effects but also positive effects too. Today, more than 65 million people are confined to wheelchairs, contending with many more obstacles than their walking peers and sitting in a world designed for standing. But thanks to robotics, the next two decades will likely see the end of the wheelchair.[9]

Furthermore there are abundant gains via using robots instead of human workforce. Even thinking yourself as doing some kinds of jobs is hard to bare. What about doing these jobs till the arranged day of your retirement? Those kinds of degrading jobs can be made by robots. For example canalizations’ controls and maintenance are so difficult to do interms of both mental and physical performance. And also some dangerous works like controlling the damages tribunes, explorations under the deep waters of oceans or volcanos etc... Robots could be used so that human honour couldn’t be degraded and could be kept from risking their lives in vain. 

Lagal Burdens Waiting For Being Terminated

And of course intervention of robots to our daily lives could also challenge our ability of making legislations. There is legal gap between the answers of these questions? Who is to blame for a fault of a robot? Who is to be punished? Owner of the robot?  The code writer of the robot? Or the robot itself. As law is defined as a normative science, it is used to make legislations after the bad things are occurred. However those mentioned bad things could be imminent as we enhance using robots.  Recently we have witnessed a sample of vandalism against a robot called HitchBOT which had encountered to take a journey around the world.[10] It can be accepted as an odd. Nonetheless perhaps vandalism against robots should be punished. Because of the fact that if any one attempts to spread aggression among society without any sensible, legal reasons, then those behaviours could also be an example for the other humans who seek the ways of evil.

 

Conclusion

In the twenty-first century, stable, long-term employment with a single employer will no longer be the norm, and unemployment or underemployment will no longer be a rare and exceptional situation. Intermittence will increasingly prevail, with individuals serving as wage earners, freelancers, entrepreneurs, and jobless at different stages of their working lives.[11] As Brynjolfsson and McAfee offer the second machine age has already began. Knowing that your mental advantages might be even greater than your physical ones, the only thing that you could do is just to be prepared, and awaken for jeopardises and also have full enjoyment of the benefits of this age.


[1] Erik Bryniofsson and Andrew McAfee, Will Humans Go The Way of Horses?, Foreign Affairs july-August 2015, p. 8 [2] Erik Bryniofsson and Andrew MacFee, Will Humans Go The Way of Horses?, Foreign Affairs july-august 2015, p. 12 [3] Illah Reza Nourbakhsh, The Coming Robot Dystopia, Foreign Affairs, July-august 2015, p. 25-26 [4] Illah Reza Nourbakhsh, The Coming Robot Dystopia, Foreign Affairs, July-august 2015, p.26 [5] Erik Bryniofsson and Andrew MacFee, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2015, p. 14 [6] Daniela Rus, The Robots Are Coming, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2015, p. 6 [7] Martin Wolf, Same As It Ever Was, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2015, p. 20 [8] Martin Wolf, Same As It Ever Was, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2015, p. 21 [9] Illah Reza Nourbakhsh, The Coming Robot Dystopia, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2015, p. 24 [10] 14 August 2015 Al Jazeree [11] Nicolas Colin and Bruno Palier, The Next Safety Net, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2015, p. 31

`k,��6?�}�&�"