Discussions:Hello, PubPub
Creative Commons License
All discussions are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit
^
3
^
George Syrimis 2/26/2016
Permalink|Reply
Private. Collaborators only.
Definitely want to see Scientific Research become a mainstream thing and where normal people can become peers and contribute
^
2
^
louis page 4/9/2016
Permalink|Reply
Private. Collaborators only.
Selection made on Version 3
We believe that the solution to an inefficient peer review system lies in a distributed peer network, transforming peer-review into peer-to-peer review. While the incentives, motivations, and experience of this are up for design, we put strong faith in the bottom-up approach. Integrating publishing into a system that allows us to reward data sharing, insightful comments, high-impact publishing, and everything else measurable enables diverse metrics on which to infer reputation and “peer-worthiness.”
diverse metrics
I’m curious that through which specific indicators to assess quantitatively the value of paper.
^
1
^
Dr.Saif Yousif 2/28/2016
Permalink|Reply
Private. Collaborators only.
Its the era of platforms, nice brilliant idea.