As participant designers, we focus on changing ourselves and the way we do things in order to change the world. Hey didn’t Gandhi say that "Be the change you wish to see in the world."
I hope that I didn’t miss all the important forms and functions of this article (the possibility is high) but when re-reading the beginning and end ( or maybe opposite sides of a cycle) of the article, I felt first (or mostly) set within a nonlinear system of explaination. Hearing tales of the entangled designers staking claim to the flat open white of non-elephant …complexities.
I would imagine, the shoulders of giants usually have wide tracks of open spaces (for others to stand on).
I see in the article the principle target of “design” being the orchestration and/or re-think of process and /or systems, inclusive of expression (thankfully).
Our rate of change is always changing. The directions of change is increasingly changing. The age of data is nonlinear.
We act on the data. Our actions create more data - continuously preceptive focus or design gives us …(return to top)